Gynecological cytology in complex contexts

Authors

Keywords:

Gynecologic cytology, post-irradiation slides, vaginal atrophy, squamous intraepithelial lesion

Abstract

Introduction: Gynecologic cytology plays a key role in the detection of cervical lesions, but certain conditions—such as post-irradiation changes and atrophic patterns—can mimic intraepithelial lesions and lead to diagnostic errors.

Objective: To describe, using morphological criteria, the differentiation between post-irradiated gynecological cytological slides, extended atrophic slides, and intraepithelial lesions.

Methods: A comparative study was conducted of the cytological characteristics observed in cervicovaginal smears from four groups: women with normal cytology, women with a history of pelvic irradiation, women with atrophic changes, and women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL). The samples were evaluated by Pap smear.

Results: This report presents a morphological comparison between slides from irradiated patients, atrophic smears, and samples with low- or high-grade squamous lesions (LSIL/HSIL), emphasizing differences in nuclei, cytoplasm, cellular background, and architectural arrangement. Distinctive signs such as multinucleation and vacuolization in irradiated patients, the predominance of parabasal cells in atrophy, and the presence of koilocytes or syncytial clusters in positive slides are highlighted.

Conclusions: Recognizing these patterns, along with integrating the clinical context, is essential to avoid false positives and improve diagnostic accuracy in cytopathological practice.

Author Biography

Alexander Duràn Flores, Policlínico Hermanos Martínez Tamayo:Baracoa.Guantánamo

Especialistas de Primer Grado en Medicina General Integral

References

1. Leaño J, Mena LO. Correlacion citológica, colposcópica e histológica de lesiones precancerígenas en cérvix. Rev. Méd. La Paz [Internet].2020 [acceso: 01/06/ 2025];26 (1): 24-31. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-89582020000100004&lng=es

2. Citorus HTC. LSIL vs HSIL: diferencias clave en citología cervical [Internet]. Publicado el 28 abril 2024. Disponible en: https://www.citorushtc.com/post/lsil-vs-hsil-diferencias-clave-en-citolog%C3%ADa-cervical

3. Citorus HTC. Entendiendo la citología atrófica: ¿qué significa y cómo se determina? [Internet]. Publicado el 12 junio 2024. Disponible en: https://bing.com/search?q=citolog%c3%ada+HSIL+LSIL+referencias+cient%c3%adficas+2020

4.De Oliveira J, Corona M, Corindia Y, Mujica J, Aguilar M, Guedes P, et al. Utilidad de la citología vaginal y antecedentes gineco-obstétricos en el diagnóstico de patologías cervicouterinas. Rev Venez Salud Pública [Internet]. 2020; 8(2): 94–122. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/9276359.pdf

5. Gamboa OA. Correlación citohistológica en muestras de citología cervical. [Tesis de posgrado]. UNAM; 2024. Disponible en: [Repositorio UNAM] (https://ru.dgb.unam.mx/bitstream/20.500.14330/TES01000855480/3/0855480.pdf)

6. Karia N, Van Loon A, Benoy I, Bogers J. Retrospective correlation between HSIL on cytology and histological CIN2+ in AML, Antwerp. J Cytol Histol [Internet]. 2020;11(1). Disponible en: https://spanish.hilarispublisher.com/archive/jch-volume-11-issue-1-year-2020.html

7.Toro M, Azuaje AB. Sociedad de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela. Células glandulares atípicas del cuello uterino: morfología y diagnóstico. Rev Soc Obstet Ginecol Venez [Internet]. 2020;80(2). Disponible en: https://bing.com/search?q=citolog%c3%ada+atr%c3%b3fico+referencias+cient%c3%adficas+2020)

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

1.
Durán Flores O, Duràn Flores A, Rodríguez López L. Gynecological cytology in complex contexts. Invest Medicoquir [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 27 [cited 2025 Dec. 27];17(1):e1011. Available from: https://revcimeq.sld.cu/index.php/imq/article/view/1011

Issue

Section

Brief communication